Welcome to The Briercliffe Society Forum

The forum is free to join and you do not need to be a member of the society. You will receive an email to activate your account before you will be able to log in. Please check spam filters and junk mail folders for this email.
It is currently Sun Apr 26, 2026 8:15 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 58 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 10:41 am 
Sage of Simonstone
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 12:07 pm
Posts: 1600
Location: Burnley
As a family they lived at Haggate until they went off their separate ways. As I say, Stephen was only 11 at the 1891 census an I lose him after that. His father died in about 1897.

_________________
Maureen
If you can't fight, wear a big 'at


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 10:58 am 
Willfinder General
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 4:51 pm
Posts: 3007
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
portia wrote:
Yes, that's the family but it's a bit of a mystery.
There were 5 sons, Samuel Wilberforce, Thomas Wilson, John Keble, William Phillip & Stephen Keble.
John died aged 2, so it wasn't him. Samuel was a joiner and by 1901 (aged 40) was living in Barrow-in-Furness so it probably wasn't him.
That leaves Thomas, William & Stephen.
In 1891 Thomas was a warehouseman living in Briercliffe, then I lose him till he dies in South Africa 1922.
1901 William was a blacksmith in Briercliffe.
1891 Stephen was only 11. I lose him after that till he dies in 1960.
I think Roger's right about it being one of this family - they're the only Corrins in Briercliffe and it's a Manx name.
But which one? Anyway I'd say we're looking at late 1800s but most likely early 1900s.
Still looking.


Maureen, how do you know Thomas died in South Africa?

I think the photo is from the 1890's. Is there another Briercliffe in England?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 11:17 am 
Sage of Simonstone
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 12:07 pm
Posts: 1600
Location: Burnley
I got the death from an MI - Briercliffe St James on the main BS page. Not sure if there's another Briercliffe - haven't ever come across one and I did a quick google but came up with nothing (didn't try really hard tho).

_________________
Maureen
If you can't fight, wear a big 'at


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 11:32 am 
Willfinder General
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 4:51 pm
Posts: 3007
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
I also googled Briercliffe and didn’t find anything so maybe this is the only one.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:17 pm 
Computer Whizz
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:28 am
Posts: 4030
Location: Near Chorley
I still think it could be the names of the couple and not the photographer. Where does it say "by" Corrin & Banks?

_________________
Gloria

I'd be dangerous with a brain.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 3:47 pm 
Willfinder General
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 4:51 pm
Posts: 3007
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
here Gloria. http://www.briercliffesociety.co.uk/Pho ... Couple.htm


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 4:49 pm 
Sage of Simonstone
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 12:07 pm
Posts: 1600
Location: Burnley
Take your point, Gloria. It doesn't say "by" anywhere. That said it doesn't usually tho.

_________________
Maureen
If you can't fight, wear a big 'at


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 1:41 pm 
Tour Guide
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 9:45 pm
Posts: 37
Location: Burnley
In 1891 there was a family called Banks just around the corner from the Corrins at 19 Southview. Head was director of Briercliffe Mill. A daughter was Susannah age 10. She would certainly have known Stephen Corrin age 11.

Can anyone put a date to the photo? Maybe the huge leg of mutton sleeves of the blouse the lady is wearing could date it?

Did the photos come with any others?

If the photo was early 1900's then Stephen and Susannah would have been in their twenties and may possibly have started up a business together but would only men be involved in photography at this time?

Thinking back to a wonderful series "House of Elliott" some years ago when early photography was part of the series.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 2:10 pm 
Willfinder General
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 4:51 pm
Posts: 3007
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
1890's
Women's dresses of the 1890's have a stylistic feature that even I can spot, the mutton-leg sleeve. Of course, this style didn't arrive full blown, but developed over the decade. In 1890 and 1891 sleeves were still tight around the arm, but at the top of the shoulder they had a small, vertical, puff. In 1892 the puff expands to envelop the upper sleeve. By 1893 the sleeve expands even more, widest at the shoulder and narrowing to the wrist. In 1895 the the style becomes even wider, and is stiffer. Finally, in 1896 the style reached its peak. In 1897 sleeves were again narrow, with only a slightly puffed top. In 1898 the sleeves were long and tight to the arm, with a round puff high at the shoulder. Unfortunately for our dating efforts, while these puffed sleeves were popular, they were not the only style used, the bishop's sleeve, for example, continued in popularity throughout the decade. Other 1890's features include looser corsets, the use of shirtwaists, and a fullness in front, often from pleats or puffs.
Men in the 1890's were wearing narrower, shorter coats, with sleeves so short that the shirt cuff was often exposed. These tightly fitted coats were worn buttoned all the way up the front. Black was the predominant color for coats and pants, and white shirts prevailed for fancy dress, though there was more variation in the color of work clothes. Collars were short and stiff, with small points. The hanging tie became popular, though bow ties were also still used.
http://www.ajmorris.com/roots/photo/datep18.php


Mel, is there anything on the back of this photo?

The early ones in my collection have fancy script http://www.briercliffesociety.co.uk/Pho ... Studio.htm

But the later ones, probably 1890’s early 1900’s have nothing on the back.
http://www.briercliffesociety.co.uk/Pho ... /Lady6.htm


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 2:33 pm 
Willfinder General
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 4:51 pm
Posts: 3007
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
Leaver wrote:
1890's

Mel, is there anything on the back of this photo?

The early ones in my collection have fancy script http://www.briercliffesociety.co.uk/Pho ... Studio.htm

But the later ones, probably 1890’s early 1900’s have nothing on the back.
http://www.briercliffesociety.co.uk/Pho ... /Lady6.htm


There is more about David Brooks studio here viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1405&p=7439&hilit=brook#p7439


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:09 pm 
Spider Lady
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 9:23 pm
Posts: 8191
Location: Staffordshire
Nothing at all Kris.

_________________
Mel

Searching for lost relatives? Win the Lottery!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:27 pm 
Computer Whizz
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:28 am
Posts: 4030
Location: Near Chorley
I have looked through the marriages 1890 - 1905 Burnley, for a Corrin and Banks and haven't found one. So perhaps that's my theory up the spout.

_________________
Gloria

I'd be dangerous with a brain.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:50 pm 
Computer Whizz
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:28 am
Posts: 4030
Location: Near Chorley
I have looked through all the photos on the site (I think) to see if I could find one with the same setting, but I couldn't. "IF" it was a Briercliffe photographers, I would have thought we could have found more than one in that setting.

_________________
Gloria

I'd be dangerous with a brain.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 4:44 pm 
Spider Lady
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 9:23 pm
Posts: 8191
Location: Staffordshire
I'd agree with you there Gloria, it's one I bought on ebay a while back.

_________________
Mel

Searching for lost relatives? Win the Lottery!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 7:29 pm 
Tour Guide
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 9:45 pm
Posts: 37
Location: Burnley
Photographers Isle of Man

The Island and especially Douglas, saw a major tourist boom in the late 1870's and 1880's - many non-Manx portrait artists came across but soon found that photography was the most popular with the tourists (most of whom would be mill operatives from the North of England). As would be expected photographers were kept busy during the 10 week season - it would also appear that several non-Manx photographers came across to Douglas purely for the season. Initially (until c.1890) most photographs would be cartes-de-visite which were small approximately 80mm x 40mm portrait views on thick card with the back given over to an impressive engraved advertisement for the photographer; later the larger Cabinet Cards (165 x 110mm) became the norm. Often some indication of a date can be obtained by looking at the address or other information (e.g. reproductions of awards obtained at the numerous exhibitions) on this face. A good selection of such faces is given either on my 'backs' page or in Here Is the News. Post 1900 the slightly smaller postcard format became the norm. Most views would be studio views using a standard backdrop or props (including a tired old donkey!) - thus it is sometimes possible to date photos by comparing these (a task only possible with access to many dated photos e.g. as in Manx Museum).

Cartes-de-visite were introduced in the late 1850's and became very popular by the mid 1860's - they were an economic method of placing up to eight exposures on a single 10 x 8 inch glass plate, made possible by the the invention of the sliding plate holder by André Disdéri. They were also used to illustrate both well known figures and scenery - a role taken over by the postcard at the turn of the century.

From www.isleofman.com/manxnotebook

Just a thought. The Corrins came from the Isle of Man. Perhaps the people on the photo are called Corrin and Banks as Gloria thinks and had their photo taken whilst visiting their relatives there.

Just another idea to add to the list!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 58 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group